[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1060134: kmod-udeb vs busybox-udeb: agree on who ships depmod



On Jan 06, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:

> Yes, some utils in busybox aren't as good as regular implementations. For
Yes. Nowadays kmod has many more features related to compressed modules 
and verification of signatures.
Can we agree that kmod should provide these programs for d-i?
Or can the d-i maintainers just tell us what they want?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: