Re: bookworm release date?
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 05:05:28PM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote:
>
>Sorry for the delayed reply, apparently I'm further behind than I
>realised. :-(
:-/ *hugs*
>On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 21:56 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>[...]
>> What do people think of the idea
>> to start picking a release date already?
>>
>[...]
>> Adam, I think we'd also want to do a point release before that time,
>> e.g. to include a fix for bug #1029803. What do you think about it?
>>
>
>Yes. We also really want to get a debian-archive-keyring update into
>bullseye before the release, or we can't use the new keys to sign the
>bookworm release files. But first we need to get it into unstable. I'm
>aware that we're very late here, sorry. :-(
>
>ftp-master have now published their bookworm keys, so we can get those
>incorporated. For the SRM side, you probably saw that we've been
>considering moving to an EC key. From the very limited responses to the
>discussion I started on debian-release, I'm still not entirely sure if
>that's feasible / a good idea.
>
>It would also be good to finally get the shim updates into bullseye at
>the same time, unless Steve tells me that's a bad plan. :-)
:-) I uploaded the latest signed shim last night expressly to have it
in the next bullseye point release. Do you want an unblock for that?
I'm also looking at some (small!) updates for grub too.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
“Why do people find DNS so difficult? It’s just cache invalidation and
naming things.”
-– Jeff Waugh (https://twitter.com/jdub)
Reply to: