[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1032364: Testing Install (update e2fsck)



Package: installation-reports

Boot method: DVD (3/2/2023) then daily CD (3/4/2023)
Image version: debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.jigdo
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.jigdo debian-testing-amd64-netinst.template
 Date: 3/2/2023 (into 3/3/2023) and 3/4/2023 Machine: Acer Nitro 5 Processor: i7, 14-core Memory: 32GB Partitions: too hard to pick up - simple partition on a 4TB M.2 - with the DVD install, 4TB 2.5" SATA - in each case the partitions set up were identical

Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card: [O] Configure network: [O] Detect media: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [E] Install base system: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup: [O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader: [O] Overall install: [E] Comments/Problems: I intend to mirror the SATA and the M.2 4TB - the installer still does not support encrypted partitions - unless it is setting up a new one.
The installer finishes and reboots but the reboot immediately aborts:
/dev/mapper/...-vg-root has unsupported feature(s): FEATURE_C12
e2fsck: Get a newer [copy] of e2fsck!

It was not clear how to obtain an updated e2fsck and how to insert it into the workflow; I can wait for the next (pre-)release.

The daily CD's template may have been mismatched to the jigdo - jigdo-lite prompted for '42' in lieu of 'OK'.

The install complained about /media/lairdheal/USB DISK/iwlwifi-so-a0-hr-b0-71.ucode (which I found it on github) and 72 (which I found in firmware-iwlwifi_20230210-1_all.deb) 
The installer did not open the .deb to use its contents. Since I was not using wifi, I did not bother to unpack it either. It looks much neater than the wild goose chase when I set up this HP Omen in 2020 or 2021.

Maybe the 4TB partitions are throwing the monkey wrench into the e2fsck works. The installer said that was the maximum.

Reply to: