Re: [rt.debian.org #9382] Upgrade dillon to bullseye
Hi,
Am 19. November 2023 02:05:46 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
>Hi Adam,
>
>Adam D. Barratt via RT <rt@rt.debian.org> (2023-11-18):
>> I'd like to look at upgrading dillon to bullseye in the
>> not-too-distant future.
>
>Sure thing.
Wow, I wasn't aware that Debian machines are running oldoldstable :-o
>> The d-i.debian.org metapackage fails to install on bullseye, because
>> it depends on ko.tex-base, which no longer exists in bullseye. The
>> removal notice suggests that its replacement is texlive-lang-korean,
>> which the metapackage already depends on for a few years now, so
>> hopefully dropping ko.tex-base shouldn't be an issue.
>
>That was an installation-guide dependency, removed in 2017, first
>released in 20180603:
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide/-/commit/3aa082a832ed636874995bf9e7bd25d0910c3365
>
>Some more cleanup might be possible in there, but if you can build a
>package that's installable again right away, let's do that.
>
>> Do you see any issues with the upgrade from a d-i perspective? Are
>> there any particularly good times to do the upgrade, or that you'd
>> prefer to avoid?
>
>I'm less used to keeping an eye on the l10n machinery than Holger does,
>so you might want to wait for an explicit ACK there, but the rest I can
>probably check and fix/adjust as needed once the upgrade happens.
>
>No particular constraints on my side, thanks for asking.
Yes, please go ahead at your own schedule
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Reply to: