Hi Faidon, and many thanks for the detailed analysis. Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org> (2022-12-22): > Going forward there are a few options: > * Revert the change and depend on debconf again. This is the safest > option, as this has been the status quo since 2007. That would look good to me. I'll admit outright that I didn't try and figure out the whole cdebconf vs. debconf situation, what we would be trying to fix, and what the benefits would be. But at least [1] reinforced my “should we be touching that? right now??” gut feeling. 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2022/11/msg00044.html Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature