Hi James, On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 22:41:41 +0100 James Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote: > Forwarded: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2017-October/ 085870.html > > Currently busybox FTBFS on the Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD. I have submitted > the above patch series upstream to fix this. Of the 7 patches you submitted upstream, 6 have been (directly) applied and are part of upstream busybox 1.28 and Debian's 1:1.30.1-1. http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2017-October/085936.html is an alternative to your 7th patch and that's also included in BB 1.28, but IIUC you didn't agree with that modified patch. I checked BB's mail archive of October/November/December 2017, but it appears there wasn't a further follow up. What do you want to (further) do with that 7th patch and this bug report? Cheers, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.