[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#877953: busybox: FTBFS on hurd-any and kfreebsd-any

Hi James,

On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 22:41:41 +0100 James Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
> Forwarded: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2017-October/
> Currently busybox FTBFS on the Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD. I have submitted
> the above patch series upstream to fix this.

Of the 7 patches you submitted upstream, 6 have been (directly) applied and 
are part of upstream busybox 1.28 and Debian's 1:1.30.1-1.
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2017-October/085936.html is an 
alternative to your 7th patch and that's also included in BB 1.28, but IIUC 
you didn't agree with that modified patch.
I checked BB's mail archive of October/November/December 2017, but it appears 
there wasn't a further follow up.

What do you want to (further) do with that 7th patch and this bug report?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: