Re: 11.1 and 10.11 planning
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 07:04:11PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks for the responses everyone. Mark indicated on IRC that he'd be
>happy to be ftpmaster-du-jour on any of the dates.
>
>On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 12:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of
>> the bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted.
>[...]
>> September 18th - not great; means freezing this coming weekend
>> September 25th - not great; I'm away during most of the week
>> beforehand, so will be unlikely to be able to deal with any issues,
>> make sure everything's ready, etc.
>> October 2nd - OK for me
>
>The conclusion seems to be that if we want to have all of the Images
>Team available then we're looking at:
>
>> October 9th - OK for me
>> October 16th - OK for me
>
>Images Team, what was the conclusion in terms of timing for the two
>point releases? Are you happy for the archive side for both to happen
>on the same day, with image testing for buster possibly being delayed,
>or would you prefer to try and separate the whole process? (In which
>case we would need all teams available for multiple dates.)
I'm happy either way, I think Andy was less sure in the case that we
got him to do both? :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
Reply to: