[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#696970: marked as done (cdebconf-gtk-udeb: Add support for an alternate logo in the banner)

Your message dated Sat, 22 May 2021 06:50:48 +0200
with message-id <YKiNqDyJaULb38GM@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696970: cdebconf-gtk-udeb: Add support for an alternate logo in the banner
has caused the Debian Bug report #696970,
regarding cdebconf-gtk-udeb: Add support for an alternate logo in the banner
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
696970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696970
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Version: 0.181
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

Hi,

currently we have a logo defined by:
| #define LOGO_IMAGE_PATH \
|     BASE_IMAGE_PATH "/logo_installer.png"

In a bug report against rootskel-gtk (bug number is pending), I suggested
we improve support for theme=dark, especially on the banner side. That'll
likely include shipping an extra logo, so a little less of hardcoding will
probably be needed at that point.

Opening this bug report as a placeholder for now.

Mraw,
KiBi.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.187

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (2012-12-30):
> currently we have a logo defined by:
> | #define LOGO_IMAGE_PATH \
> |     BASE_IMAGE_PATH "/logo_installer.png"
> 
> In a bug report against rootskel-gtk (bug number is pending), I suggested
> we improve support for theme=dark, especially on the banner side. That'll
> likely include shipping an extra logo, so a little less of hardcoding will
> probably be needed at that point.
> 
> Opening this bug report as a placeholder for now.

I think I forgot about that bug report (having a See reference for
#696969 only in the changelog), but that was addressed long ago in:

    commit a209703c314604238f0c03c528b8dc4d0bfb9eb5
    Author: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
    Date:   Fri Feb 28 20:38:38 2014 +0300
    
        Add support for loading an alternate banner when the GTK theme name is "dark" (Closes: #740358).
        
        Fall back to the regular one if it's not available (See: #696969).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: