> We don't ship udebs for firmware. So please discuss first how this > s[h]ould work I presumed a udeb was necessary for it to be usable during installation. If it's not needed, that's good to hear and I guess I'll hold off. If that's because the ordinary .deb is suitable (it conforms to udeb requirements), I wonder what my next steps are to see it incorporated in the installation images.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.