Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>]

On 2020-11-24 20:18:15 [+0000], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> That would be preferable at this point, yes, sorry. We should try and
> make sure it's sorted soon afterwards though, to avoid things getting
> stuck again.

I will set up an alarm on my side :)

> At some point, could we please have a combined / single diff between
> the current 1.1.1d-0+deb10u3 and the proposed 1.1.1h-0+deb10u1 (I
> assume)?

Sure. I will prepare one tomorrow.

> Regards,
> 
> Adam

Sebastian