[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#951709: /boot should get a bigger share of disk in default installation



Hi,

Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 18:50 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > > Package: debian-installer
> > > > Version: 20190702+deb10u3
> > > > Severity: important
> > > > 
> > > > With initrd around 60+ MBs, 236 MB /boot in a 300 GB hard disk can hold 
> > > > only 2 versions of the kernels at the same time. When installing a 3rd 
> > > > kernel /boot gets filled up. I think it should be able to store at 
> > > > least 3 kernels and ideally 4 or even more.
> > > >
> > > > The paritions were created automatically with just /home in a separate 
> > > > partition with lvm by debian buster installer.
> > > 
> > > I agree; the default size of /boot is now too small.  I think we should
> > > normally allocate at least 500 MB to it.
> > 
> > This has just been addressed; see
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/commit/cf6b2d152b08b6c78da6a6f7ca26a99bdadfdfce
> > 
> Not quite.  If Ben says we need at least 500M, then we'll have to
> adjust further, as that commit uses 512M as a maximum.  For comparison
> Ubuntu's partman-auto sets the min at 512M and max at 768M.  Do people
> feel that's where we should go?

I assume that for cases with a reasonably dimension'ed harddisk, the 
setting of "512 as a maximum" will result in a /boot partition with
this max size? Or with other words, for most people that would work.

One the other hand, if we touch that setting anyway now, we could also 
switch to a future-proof setting as in Ubuntu...


Holger

-- 
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076


Reply to: