Re: Bug#976094: buster-pu: package grub2/2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u3
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 04:46:43PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I do have a _slight_ concern that someone with a crazily small /boot
> will end up being broken by the new backup code, but agree that it is
> better than the current situation.
It's true that this is a possibility. I'd like to add that the total
size of /boot/grub/ at least on the buster system I have handy here is
~12MB, about a third of the size of an initramfs - so any system that
close to the wire will probably be in trouble soon anyway.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: