Bug#805305: tasksel: Please consider adding GNOME Flashback as a desktop choice
- To: 805305@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: nicoo <nicoo@debian.org>, Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#805305: tasksel: Please consider adding GNOME Flashback as a desktop choice
- From: Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 13:48:41 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20201206134841.a51889006505ee19cb989f31@mailbox.org>
- Reply-to: Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>, 805305@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20201127184846.f401380b248e8a0d214a17a9@mailbox.org>
- References: <144770305609.9121.1362542441896824125@mitya57.me> <144770305609.9121.1362542441896824125@mitya57.me> <20201118013806.wegfmexpo2relcqc@bogus> <144770305609.9121.1362542441896824125@mitya57.me> <20201120142640.a336b8c95c0eafbb75252670@mailbox.org> <144770305609.9121.1362542441896824125@mitya57.me> <20201127184846.f401380b248e8a0d214a17a9@mailbox.org> <144770305609.9121.1362542441896824125@mitya57.me>
Control: tags -1 + pending
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> wrote:
> > For me personally, I would support the addition of Gnome Flashback.
> > The Unity and gnome-shell concepts had shown high potential of polarizing
> > the community, and a relevant amount of people chose to stay on the old
> > gnome2 concept. Which is why Gnome Flashback came up :-)
> > So +1 for this.
>
> Any objections against the addition of a Gnome Flashback task?
>
> > Commenting on the implementation of this:
> > I don't get the advantages of dividing Gnome into two tasks (task-gnome-common
> > and task-gnome-desktop). Looks not easier to me.
> > Why not leave the original Gnome desktop untouched and simply add the packages
> > we want in Gnome Flashback?
Now pushed to git.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Reply to: