Bug#890192: marked as done (installation-reports pseudo package)

To: Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>

Subject: Bug#890192: marked as done (installation-reports pseudo package)

From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>

Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 03:05:38 +0000

Message-id: <[🔎] handler.890192.D890192.15979787193488.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>

References: <[🔎] 20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600db2d@mailbox.org> <CAOBkfEXa-Qi8jKTya0Wo10r7yj=v4t+GP3mond=58pq9GaPhuA@mail.gmail.com>

Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2020 04:58:02 +0200 with message-id <[🔎] 20200821045802.07acb7c9ded347064600db2d@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #890192, regarding installation-reports pseudo package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 890192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890192 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation-reports pseudo package
From: Chris Dunn <chrisdunn214@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 13:54:50 -0500
Message-id: <CAOBkfEXa-Qi8jKTya0Wo10r7yj=v4t+GP3mond=58pq9GaPhuA@mail.gmail.com>

Package: installation-reports

Boot method: <How did you boot the installer? usb thumb drive
Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/buster_di_alpha2/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-buster-DI-alpha2-amd64-DVD-1.iso
Date: <Date and time of the install> 4th February 04.00am

Machine: <Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)> Chuwi Hi12 tablet
Processor: Intel Atom x5-Z8350 (-MCP-)
Memory: 3854.8MB
Partitions: <df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred>

sysfs          sysfs          0     0     0    - /sys
proc           proc           0     0     0    - /proc
udev           devtmpfs    1.9G     0  1.9G   0% /dev
devpts         devpts         0     0     0    - /dev/pts
tmpfs          tmpfs       386M   12M  375M   3% /run
/dev/mmcblk0p2 ext4         53G   11G   40G  22% /
securityfs     securityfs     0     0     0    - /sys/kernel/security
tmpfs          tmpfs       1.9G     0  1.9G   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs          tmpfs       5.0M  4.0K  5.0M   1% /run/lock
tmpfs          tmpfs       1.9G     0  1.9G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
cgroup         cgroup2        0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/unified
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd
pstore         pstore         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/pstore
efivarfs       efivarfs       0     0     0    - /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls,net_prio
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/pids
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/devices
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event
cgroup         cgroup         0     0     0    - /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct
systemd-1      autofs         0     0     0    - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
mqueue         mqueue         0     0     0    - /dev/mqueue
hugetlbfs      hugetlbfs      0     0     0    - /dev/hugepages
debugfs        debugfs        0     0     0    - /sys/kernel/debug
/dev/mmcblk0p1 vfat        511M  256K  511M   1% /boot/efi
tmpfs          tmpfs       386M   20K  386M   1% /run/user/1000

Output of lspci -nn:

00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280] (rev 36)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series PCI Configuration Registers [8086:22b0] (rev 36)
00:03.0 Multimedia controller [0480]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series Imaging Unit [8086:22b8] (rev 36)
00:0b.0 Signal processing controller [1180]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series Power Management Controller [8086:22dc] (rev 36)
00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series USB xHCI Controller [8086:22b5] (rev 36)
00:16.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:22b7] (rev 36)
00:1a.0 Encryption controller [1080]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series Trusted Execution Engine [8086:2298] (rev 36)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series PCU [8086:229c] (rev 36)

Base System Installation Checklist:
 [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [0]
Detect network card:    [0]
Configure network:      [0]
Detect CD:              [0]
Load installer modules: [0]
Detect hard drives:     [0]
Partition hard drives:  [0]
Install base system:    [0]
Clock/timezone setup:   [0]
User/password setup:    [0]
Install tasks:          [0]
Install boot loader:    [0]
Overall install:        [0]

Comments/Problems:

I believe (from memory) that the configure network took more than one try 
and on a first installation (of 2) the install tasks page did not show up.

Second install was fine.

 <Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
      and ideas you had during the initial install.>

I used guided partitioning of the whole disk and was a little surprised

to be offered 1mb + 500+mb + balance to / + 4?gb swap + 1mb

Some explanation of the offering would have been useful.

The grub install options were somewhat alarming and I copped out and installed

grub to a separate partition but still wonder if this was necessary

--- End Message ---

Reply to: