[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#968401: marked as done (partman-efi version 85: fstab/efi is missing the executable flag)



Your message dated Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:22:36 +0000
with message-id <E1k6cTU-0006CR-E4@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#968401: fixed in partman-efi 86
has caused the Debian Bug report #968401,
regarding partman-efi version 85: fstab/efi is missing the executable flag
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
968401: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968401
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: partman-efi
Severity: important
Tags: d-i

Logging a bug against this, since it's a rather important issue.

https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/commit/1a096e6ede94cce8e5272e31946a506ae7f611e7.patch had the rather unfortunate side effect of removing the +x attribute from fstab/efi.

Combined with finish.d/20mount_partitions using a loop that checks for the executable flag before running the scripts from fstab.d:

        for i in /lib/partman/fstab.d/*; do
                [ -x "$i" ] || continue
                $i
        done |

this effectively means that fstab/efi is no longer executed.

A patch has been submitted in:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-efi/-/merge_requests/2

Regards,

/Pete

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: partman-efi
Source-Version: 86
Done: Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-efi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 968401@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org> (supplier of updated partman-efi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:03:47 +0100
Source: partman-efi
Architecture: source
Version: 86
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org>
Closes: 968401
Changes:
 partman-efi (86) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Pete Batard ]
   * Fix executable permission for fstab.d/efi. Closes: #968401
Checksums-Sha1:
 dd649bec7b3c6a7ae3df84497a531b291af0af7a 1721 partman-efi_86.dsc
 490a82620d20cca8250b9552145e4ce10c352dc5 55856 partman-efi_86.tar.xz
 a897dbd49a157913d6b1b42b0a87b52ccb4451ab 5292 partman-efi_86_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 015153d2a02695074e459dd16873a3bb86a2fa43b0d6b2790af07543629ff96f 1721 partman-efi_86.dsc
 fbf84bacc53df7e495ca14e5bd30f2aafe57038850233ac3c9999cd0a69fc87b 55856 partman-efi_86.tar.xz
 76696f3981e565aa6020f36ab556a01058410406f91d84bb263f17875dc3cb47 5292 partman-efi_86_source.buildinfo
Files:
 099a0bc48fa9765c36ba1ec8c188b6e9 1721 debian-installer standard partman-efi_86.dsc
 2dbe43780d66df07b5ab6ef63b0fbffc 55856 debian-installer standard partman-efi_86.tar.xz
 0a5e41431d856ef3708c8d48b1ff83fc 5292 debian-installer standard partman-efi_86_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=x2cc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: