Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway
- To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#901255: netcfg-static: Unable to configure fe80::1 as a gateway
- From: Igor Scheller <debian@igorscheller.de>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 19:27:52 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 16d135c7-2e5b-3780-0f42-9fd0b1827f2c@igorscheller.de>
- In-reply-to: <20180612123211.apfuxj3fsymlrz5l@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
- References: <152864987000.17042.16864572975539374330.reportbug@LapZ.caleano.com> <8d516413-bbf5-6ff9-ba6f-237f9344b102@debian.org> <6adcea8d-78e5-0b80-574f-f17b9937349f@igorscheller.de> <87h8m8v12p.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <20180612093043.2rvjohd2cnw3srwv@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <152864987000.17042.16864572975539374330.reportbug@LapZ.caleano.com> <87r2lctf6o.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <20180612115722.iuw4gjftii4mugh6@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <152864987000.17042.16864572975539374330.reportbug@LapZ.caleano.com> <87fu1std8z.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <20180612123211.apfuxj3fsymlrz5l@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
Hi,
On 12.06.18 14:32, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ok, then netcfg-static needs to be improved to do that.
> [...]
>> let's just flag the Debian IPv6 implementation as broken on this point
>> and move on.
> And let it stay broken at vitam æternam?...
>
> It's a matter of someone fixing the code. It seems Igor Scheller is
> happy to work on it, he just needs a way forward, not being only told
> that what is currently there is nonsense.
>
> Samuel
Imho this "partial fix" could be added anyway (maybe with a remark of
"needs to be implemented in a proper way)?
That would at least solve the problem in that case.
Igor
PS: Happy b-day to this PR also, its alive (and dead at the same time)
for 2 years
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: