[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#953593: debootstrap: --no-check-gpg and --keyring options not working with Debian stable chroots



Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: normal

Hi,

the --keyring and --no-check-gpg options do not seem to be passed on to
"apt-get update". When I try to debootstrap with these options I get in
my debootstrap.log:

Ign:1 http://127.0.0.1:8000/debian stable InRelease
Hit:2 http://127.0.0.1:8000/debian stable Release
Ign:3 http://127.0.0.1:8000/debian stable Release.gpg
Get:4 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates InRelease [65.4 kB]
Get:5 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates/main amd64 Packages [182 kB]
Get:6 http://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates/main Translation-en [96.0 kB]
Reading package lists...
E: The repository 'http://127.0.0.1:8000/debian stable Release' is not signed.

The rest of debootstrap before worked fine because I used --no-check-gpg
but it fails at this step. Same with the --keyring option.

Thanks!

cheers, josch


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  wget  1.20.1-1.1

Versions of packages debootstrap recommends:
ii  arch-test               0.15-2
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2019.1
ii  gnupg                   2.2.19-2

Versions of packages debootstrap suggests:
pn  squid-deb-proxy-client                   <none>
ii  ubuntu-keyring [ubuntu-archive-keyring]  2018.09.18.1-5

-- no debconf information


Reply to: