[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#942664: marked as done (debootstrap: please include mdadm and lvm2)



Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:55:34 -0700
with message-id <CAFHYt57w2Pbm2W1+d2hFRuYBz-Od208m0PdzpD-UrhSO4zwYYg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#942664: debootstrap: please include mdadm and lvm2
has caused the Debian Bug report #942664,
regarding debootstrap: please include mdadm and lvm2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
942664: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debootstrap
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Many modern setups use mdadm or lvm2 (even on root) but both are hard
to come by after rebooting. Would it make sense to include both of
them in the scripts so that the tools are automatically available?

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:39 PM Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> wrote:
>
> I think that allows to close this wishlist report.

No, it is not the same thing. I already install many other packages
with apt after entering the chroot, and can easily do so for madam and
lvm even without the option. The point is that, given trends in usage,
both packages are now essential. They should be installed
automatically.

At the same time, reasonable minds can differ. You have a much better
purview of what your customers need (and I am only one). Thanks for
looking at the issue, and for providing this trusted piece of Debian
infrastructure. Closing this bug.

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

--- End Message ---

Reply to: