[ Please don't drop submitters; quoting in full accordingly. ] Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> (2019-08-24): > Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes: > > > Control: tag -1 - d-i > > > > Hi Gustavo, > > > > Gustavo Romero Vazquez <gustavorv86@gmail.com> (2019-08-23): > >> See the Wiki Debian (https://wiki.debian.org/Status/Testing), the > >> security repositories for bullseye are the next (and they working): > >> > >> deb http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free > >> deb-src http://security.debian.org testing-security main contrib non-free > >> > >> Regards and good luck!! > > > > You're absolutely right. I had stashed a branch a while ago, but it was > > suggested to handle things slightly differently: > > > > “do it other way around and hardcode the old releases rather than > > hardcode the new one?” > > > > I've just rebased it on top of master, and it'd be great if someone > > could rework it to take the above comment in consideration: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/tree/pu/security-naming-scheme > > Hopefully something like this what you were wanting done: > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/commit/78078caff231de7bb5a161fa19210b4ac6eb2cb5 Yes, that looks sane enough. I meant to check how this could affect Ubuntu. But from what I can see in apt-setup/0.141ubuntu2, there are a bunch of changes already anyway, so except for a possible merge conflict, that shouldn't be much of an issue. Feel free to release that to master/the archive if you like. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature