Re: Bug#933764: buster-pu: package e2fsprogs/1.44.5-1+deb10u1
(Removing 933764@bugs.debian.org from the cc list)
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 01:06:18PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - d-i
>
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 02:37:25PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > As there's a udeb involved I will just check with the d-i release managers
> > that this isn't an issue, though I can't see that fixing a crash would be
> > all that controversial.
>
> I can confirm that d-i doesn't call e4defrag.
> (The binary isn't even installed in the udeb)
Somewhat off-topic, so apologies for the thread hijack, but while
we're on the subject, do we have the right binaries in the e2fsprogs
udeb? In particular, we seem to have the following binaries in the
udeb:
Binaries:
/sbin/badblocks
/sbin/e2fsck
/sbin/mke2fs
/sbin/resize2fs
/sbin/tune2fs
Symlinks:
/sbin/e2label -> tune2fs
/sbin/e2mmpstatus -> dumpe2fs (broken symlink; will remove)
/sbin/fsck.ext2 -> e2fsck
/sbin/fsck.ext3 -> e2fsck
/sbin/fsck.ext4 -> e2fsck
/sbin/mkfs.ext2 -> mke2fs
/sbin/mkfs.ext3 -> mke2fs
/sbin/mkfs.ext4 -> mke2fs
Would the d-i team like me to remove any of the above as not being
used, in future releases of the e2fsprogs package? Is there anything
you'd like me too add (perhaps because it would be useful in rescue
situations?)
Thanks,
- Ted
Reply to: