Re: Bug#911169: console-setup: can vidcontrol and kbdcontrol depends be removed for non-kfreebsd archs?
Hi,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 18:57 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 19:43 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > > Package: console-setup
> > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Holger Wansing <linux@wansing-online.de> wrote:
> > > > > Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> wrote:
> > > > > > I noticed that the latest upload of console-setup fails to
> > > > > > migrate to testing.
> > > > > > It claims being "uninstallable on amd64", while
> > > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=console-setup&arch=all&ver=1.185&stamp=1534275854&raw=0
> > > > > > says that the build was successful.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How can I find out what is wrong here?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm, at the 15. day it migrated to testing now, while I cannot see that
> > > > > something has changed.
> > > >
> > > > console-setup needs several attempts everytime, 'til it migrates.
> > > >
> > > > The point is, that autopkgtest claims about unmet dependencies for all
> > > > archs (packages vidcontrol and kbdcontrol being unavailable).
> > > > However, these packages are only existing for kfreebsd.
[...]
> > Ok. Anything else that can be done about this?
> > Maybe change
> >
> > - Architecture: all
> > + Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
> >
> > for console-setup-freebsd?
> [...]
>
> That seems reasonable as it's not a very big package.
>
> Ben.
I just found that there is already another bugreport about this and
tagged as wontfix:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619328
So I close this bug as a duplicate.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Finterprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Reply to: