[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#784206: [installation-guide] Re: "Compiling a New Kernel" section is hugely outdated



On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 20:34 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > Package: installation-manual
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > There are many things wrong with the current text for "Compiling
> > a New Kernel".
> > 
> > - "It is often not necessary since the default kernel shipped with
> >   Debian handles most configurations."  This is a great under-
> >   statement: almost all configurations are covered.
> > 
> > - "Also, Debian often offers several alternative kernels."  Actually
> >   there is less and less need for alternative kernels...
> > 
> > - It recommends using kernel-package, but the upstream "make deb-pkg"
> >   recipe is usually a better choice
> > 
> > - The linux-source-2.6 metapackage was transitional in wheezy and
> >   _does_not_exist_ in jessie.
> > 
> > - The list of build-dependencies is missing many packages.
> > 
> > I propose to remove almost the entire text and refer to the
> > Debian Kernel Handbook (online and packaged).
> 
> I would like to change it this way, if noone objects:
[...]

Looks good to me.

I also just pushed a change to update the URL for the Debian Linux
Kernel Handbook.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Tomorrow will be cancelled due to lack of interest.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: