[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#903047: Netinst image cannot load e1000e, ixgbe, igb eth. drivers



Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2018-07-07 15:07:08)
> Control: severity -1 normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Clayton Craft <clayton.a.craft@intel.com> (2018-07-05):
> > Package: installation-reports
> > Justification: Unable to install debian with netinst image on systems with these NICs
> > 
> > 
> > With the latest weekly Debian testing netinst image (06-25 and 07-02 tested),
> 
> Please always include the full URL to the image you're reporting an
> issue against.

The image was found under here, but has since been removed:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/

> 
> > the e1000e, ixgbe, and igb modules cannot load.
> > Attempting to do so generates this message in the kernel log:
> > 
> >         Unknown symbol: refcount_inc (error 0)
> > 
> > The kernel on this image is reported as 4.16.0-2, and magic ver from
> > 'modinfo' reports the same version. Perhaps there's some other module
> > dependency that is not included in the image?
> 
> It's rather due to having an installer embedding the kernel at version
> 4.16.12-1 (current when that installer was built) while the debian-cd
> tooling included more recent kernel udebs (4.16.16-2, current when the
> installation image was built).

Well that's not confusing at all. /sarcasm

> 
> For reference, the exact kernel version can be seen using:
> 
>     cat /proc/version
> 
> > Note that I did not try to load all ethernet drivers included in the
> > image, so it's possible that there are more drivers affected.
> > 
> > This issue makes it impossible to install Debian testing with the
> > netinst image on system with these ethernet adapters.
> 
> Please use released images instead?
> 
> This issue is common during development phases, and I'd usually advise
> running either a released image (esp. for this netinst usecase), or a
> d-i daily build (esp. for the netboot usecase). Please note the latter
> is only a d-i build against unstable, there's no matching installation
> image.

> 
> See the last announce:
>   https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2018/20180619
> 
> More on:
>   https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> 
> 
> Awaiting feedback, but this is a good candidate for a not-a-bug closure.

What's the point in producing testing images if you're not willing to accept bug
reports against it? Would you rather bugs like this make it into a release
before being reported? If no one is supposed to use testing images, perhaps
consider renaming them to "DO NOT USE THIS IMAGE.iso"

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: