Bug#877735: busybox: m68k build broken due to "-Os" in CFLAGS
- To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>, 877735@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#877735: busybox: m68k build broken due to "-Os" in CFLAGS
- From: Chris Boot <bootc@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:45:16 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] bacef7a2-f7a1-e16f-2ab9-0421b64f0565@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Chris Boot <bootc@debian.org>, 877735@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <a9f5598b-7b94-e71d-ab75-2aff62efe52e@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- References: <150715899716.21351.14956363415364529265.reportbug@stretch64.physik.fu-berlin.de> <998e4cf2-07bd-cb2d-1c47-c373372ce3fe@physik.fu-berlin.de> <CAEQ9gEmFPeibJUANPFbkTJfjyv6hLOG7Wr=ijyfrVSfRkKPEtw@mail.gmail.com> <150715899716.21351.14956363415364529265.reportbug@stretch64.physik.fu-berlin.de> <fb548f7a-eb98-949b-296c-fd031d8afa5f@physik.fu-berlin.de> <150715899716.21351.14956363415364529265.reportbug@stretch64.physik.fu-berlin.de> <20171005164054.k3tln4hduzmaw4tb@tack.einval.com> <1507237676@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <150715899716.21351.14956363415364529265.reportbug@stretch64.physik.fu-berlin.de> <a9f5598b-7b94-e71d-ab75-2aff62efe52e@physik.fu-berlin.de> <150715899716.21351.14956363415364529265.reportbug@stretch64.physik.fu-berlin.de>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 06/10/17 01:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 11:49 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> So please take this to gcc first unless you've
>> already done so. And let us know if you get the impression this won't
>> get fixed soon-ish - breaking an architecture still beats packaging
>> principles.
>
> gcc bugs aren't usually something that get fixed promptly, in particular
> when talking about non-mainstream architectures like m68k.
Hi Adrian,
Is this still a problem with current gcc on m68k? I see that gcc points
at gcc-7 (>= 7.2.0-1~) in sid and, as far as I can tell, it also applies
to m68k.
To me this is really a gcc bug, and the fix belongs there. busybox has a
real interest in remaining small on several architectures, and I really
don't believe a workaround like this belongs in the busybox package.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bootc@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: