On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Chris Boot <bootc@debian.org> wrote: > On 23/01/18 15:17, Chris Boot wrote: >> On 22/01/18 17:23, Bastian Blank wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>>> Chris Boot <bootc@debian.org> (2018-01-22): >>>>> What should it be called? >>>> >>>> Good question. d-i looks good to me, and would match the current group >>>> on alioth. debian-boot is historical and I think we should keep only >>>> the list named this way (along with IRC). >>> >>> Or just use "installer-team". >> >> I don't mind d-i-team or installer-team or even debian-installer-team, >> but the self-service interface always adds "-team" to the end. Not >> having -team on the end presumably means asking the admin folks to do it >> manually for us, so it's probably best avoided unless we really want to. > > Hi all, > > Any further thoughts about this? > > Of the simple options, "installer-team" feels like the most appropriate > to me. 'installer-team' would be my top choice too (given that the -team bit seems to be necessary to accommodate the fact that gitlab uses the same namespace for teams and users). Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature