Hi, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> (2017-02-13): > On 04/02/17 15:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Please unblock package openssl. It contains a redo of the rules file > > among other packaging related changes which did not migrate in time > > due to the new release of the d version which fixes 3 CVE bugs. The > > d-2 version fixes a regression discovered by perl and FTBFS of > > openssl itself if arch-any and arch-all were built in one go. > > > > unblock openssl/1.1.0d-2 > > That includes some changes we don't like during the freeze, but given > those were done before the freeze and I wouldn't want them reverted > this early in the freeze, I would be happy to unblock this... but can > you attach a binary debdiff (e.g. debdiff an old and new .changes > file) to make sure things are still looking good? I'm also interested in seeing a binary debdiff to make sure things are still in place in the udeb (since that's something the maintainer would usually be less aware of or not able to easily test)… > Also please make minimal changes from now on (e.g. for 1.1.0e). > > Cyril, does this look fine from a d-i perspective at this stage? No specific objections (even if I prefer shorter diffs too). KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature