[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#867814: stretch-pu: package ncurses/6.0+20161126-1+deb9u1



Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed

On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 19:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> (2017-09-06):
> > Meanwhile seven new CVEs in the tic library and programs have been
> > reported, and I would like to fix those as well, see the attached
> > new
> > debdiff.  It contains all the library changes from the 20170826
> > upstream
> > patchlevel and the program fixes of the 20170902 patchlevel.  I
> > have
> > also attached the test cases for the 13 bugs reported in the Red
> > Hat
> > bugtracker.
> > 
> > > > > I'd be okay with this, but it will need a kibi-ack due to the
> > > > > udeb.
> > > > 
> > > > The changes do not touch the tinfo library which is all that
> > > > shipped in
> > > > the udeb.
> > > 
> > > To elaborate on that, ncurses/tinfo/{alloc,parse}_entry.c are
> > > compiled
> > > into the tic library while progs/dump_entry.c is for the infocmp
> > > and tic
> > > programs.  Building 6.0+20161126-1 and 6.0+20161126-1+deb9u1 in a
> > > stretch chroot produced identical libtinfo.so.5.9 files.
> > 
> > This is unfortunately no longer the case, since strings.c and
> > trim_sgr0.c are compiled into the tinfo library.  However, the
> > changes
> > to these files are small.
> 
> I have no straightforward way to double check things still run
> smoothly
> with stretch's d-i, so I'll follow whatever decision the release team
> makes; if regressions pop up, we'll figure out how to fix them.
> 

Let's go with it and keep our fingers crossed that any issues show up
quickly.

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: