[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#867898: AW: Bug#867898: debian-installer-netboot-images: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 scsi modules missing. Netboot image unusable



Ah...that was a good hint the the "exclude" list.

Now I got it. In "jessie", the modules I - currently - need, have been put into scsi-extra-modules....

[root@server debian-jessie]# head -2 README.txt
        Debian GNU/Linux 8.2.0 "Jessie" - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1
                               20150906-11:13
[root@server debian-jessie]# find . -iname "scsi-*.udeb" -type f
./pool/main/l/linux/scsi-extra-modules-3.16.0-4-amd64-di_3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3_amd64.udeb
[root@server debian-jessie]#

root@server# ar -xf scsi-extra-modules-3.16.0-4-amd64-di_3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3_amd64.udeb data.tar.xz
root@server# tar -tJf data.tar.xz |grep mpt
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas.ko
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas.ko
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/message/fusion/mptspi.ko
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/message/fusion/mptscsih.ko
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.ko
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/message/fusion/mptfc.ko
./lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.ko
root@server#

So....as these modules have been "moved" to scsi-modules (see https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2016/20160521), but scsi-modules is "excluded" forever, this causes my error.

Isn't it?

Regards,
Robert


Von: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2017 02:36
An: Cyril Brulebois
Cc: Paschedag, Robert; 867898@bugs.debian.org; debian-kernel@lists.debian.org; debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Bug#867898: debian-installer-netboot-images: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 scsi modules missing. Netboot image unusable
 

Reply to: