Hi, Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25) > Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> (2016-09-12): > > This is a transient situation because some Essential packages' > > dependencies changed. I'd consider this a bug in the archive, not in > > debootstrap. > Any reasons to keep this bug report open then? Seen no objections, so I'm > tempted to close it. But... the buildd variant still explicitly (and not only implicitly through dependencies of essential:yes packages) installs Priority:required packages, no? cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature