Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org> (2017-06-23): > Le 04/02/17 à 02:53, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > >None besides “we need a busybox maintainer”, unfortunately. > > :/ (This is still true, btw.) > >>In the meantime, libselinux is now building a udeb, so I guess > >>SELinux support could also be enabled in the udeb build of busybox > >I'm not sure I understand why we would need SELinux within d-i. > > That would allow installing debian with selinux installed by default > (well even if this is a long term goal and the current policy is > probably not ready for this) I don't think I've seen explanations as to why we would need support within the installer. Isn't it sufficient to call the appropriate commands within /target (i.e. in the being-installed system), as opposed to running them from a d-i context (outside /target)? KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature