[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#280231: marked as done (partman-lvm: LVM over RAID1 : created raid partition is marked as lvm volume, but not manually possible)

Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2017 09:57:00 +0000
with message-id <e7347cdf-f7cc-2823-ebf3-f470a5309094@a4nancy.net.eu.org>
and subject line Closing bug report
has caused the Debian Bug report #280231,
regarding partman-lvm: LVM over RAID1 : created raid partition is marked as lvm volume, but not manually possible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

280231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=280231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: partman-lvm
Version: 2004.11.08 daily builds of d-i.
Severity: important

As said, i created (on powerpc/pegasos) a raid 1 group, and the resulting
partition on the raid volume is automatically marked as lvm. I don't remember
this happening on raid 0 setups, but will have to test again.

Anyway, when entering the raid partition, and wanting to set the type by hand,
it is not possible to set the partition to LVM, while it should.


Sven Luther

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

I'm closing this bug, since it was tagged "moreinfo" for ten years
without an answer. If you still encounter this problem, please feel free
to re-open it or ask me to do it.

Thanks for your contribution!

--- End Message ---

Reply to: