Adam D. Barratt <email@example.com> (2017-04-02): > Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. > > The proposed diff looks okay to me but, whilst afaics the udeb > shouldn't be affected, I'd still appreciate a d-i ack; CCing and > tagging appropriately. No objections (note the “via via” in the diff though), thanks for checking. KiBi.
Description: Digital signature