On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 15:46 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] > I find it hard to decided what to do with these patches, given the amount of > options that can be passed to the kernel… The current behaviour is clearly not > good but I'm not sure what can/could break as a result… Please go ahead. There may be some users that set module options at installation time and don't want them set in the installed system. But they are likely to be outnumbered by those who do want them set. If the installer can boot with those module options then the installed system very likely can too. > At least, are there any plans to keep the list of hardcoded things uptodate? This is a good point. Is there a list of things to check during each release cycle? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part