[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#858849: installation-reports: Successful Jessie installation with backported kernel 4.9.16-1+reiser4.0.1 on i915 system AMD64



Niltze,

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Metztli Information Technology <jose@metztli-it.com> (2017-03-27):
>> Boot method: CD/USB
>> Image version: https://metztli.it/readOnlyEphemeral/xiuhcohuatl.iso built on Mar 25 08:35 (2017)
>> Date: Mar 26, 2017, 01:49
>
> A couple of months ago, I asked:
> | Do we need to get installation reports for non-Debian installers?
> | This isn't something we produce, publish, or support, so…
>
> It would be nice if those installation reports could be sent elsewhere;
> thanks already.
>
>
> KiBi.

With all due respect, 99% of the build code for the debian-installer
is yours. As well as the build pulls 99% UDEBs from official debian
repositories.

i.e., this is a Debian issue, not mine -- as I did not even touch that
code and/or modules -- which 1 month ago actually did work smooth:

Netboot debian-installer was unable to load firmware from second USB
for wifi connection;
accordingly, in another virtual screen, I mounted the 2nd USB and
manually copied the firmware
directory onto the installer environment /lib. d-i then detected the
wifi signal, etc.


Second, report on this unofficial jessie-backports kernel
4.9.16-1+reiser4.0.1 sheds light on the fact I experienced *no issue*
with module i915, as had been reported by (maintainer?):
< https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858078 >
thus, in a collateral manner, I am contributing to official debian development.

Finally, I am not requesting *any* support. I am simply reporting that
your d-i pulling official UDEBs actually have been successful, with
minor modifications and a few extra UDEBs of mine, in my installation
experience, following Debian documentation guidelines:

"We also encourage installation reports to be sent even if the
installation is successful, so that we can get as much information as
possible on the largest number of hardware configurations."
< https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch05s04.html.en#submit-bug >

If you are still 'bothered' with my sporadic submissions, I encourage
you to modify the documentation to specifically exclude the glaring
omission.


Best Professional Regards.

-- 
Jose R R
http://metztli.it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Debian-Reiser4 for AMD64 https://sf.net/projects/debian-reiser4/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way!


Reply to: