Re: Archive changes
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:54:03AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Pretty sure this breaks (will break, when the change is propagated outside
> experimental) d-i as it stands, due to the check on all 3 checksums in
> net-retriever.
Looking at the code, I don't think that's true. It skips checksums that
are missing from Release, and it stops after the first checksum that it
successfully finds. Unless I'm looking at the wrong bit of
net-retriever?
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: