[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#789961: marked as done (partman-partitioning: add support of mips64el)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:48:21 +0100
with message-id <d213f417-2770-1e01-d87b-d449d0283b7a@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#789961: partman-partitioning: add support of mips64el
has caused the Debian Bug report #789961,
regarding partman-partitioning: add support of mips64el
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

789961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: partman-partitioning
Version: 108

diff --git a/lib/disk-label.sh b/lib/disk-label.sh
index b24f4a8..c77403c 100644
--- a/lib/disk-label.sh
+++ b/lib/disk-label.sh
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ default_disk_label () {
  echo UNKNOWN;;
-    mipsel)
+    mipsel|mips64el)
  case "$sub" in
     4kc-malta | 5kc-malta)
  # MIPS Malta

Or it will complain that don't know which partition table to use by default.

YunQiang Su

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 112

An alternative fix for this was applied in 112:

partman-partitioning (112) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Aurelien Jarno ]
  * Default to msdos partition label on mips, mipsel and mips64el. We
    don't support hardware requiring other partition labels anymore.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: