[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#826578: marked as done (hw-detect: check-missing-firmware ignores symlinked firmware packages)



Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:46:52 +0200
with message-id <575AC4CC.4000308@iserv.eu>
and subject line Re: Bug#826578: hw-detect: check-missing-firmware ignores symlinked firmware packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #826578,
regarding hw-detect: check-missing-firmware ignores symlinked firmware packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
826578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826578
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hw-detect
Severity: important
Tags: d-i patch

Dear Maintainer,

we are distributing our system with a custom Debian installer that has
been created with simple-cdd and contains non-free firmware packages.
One of our customers has reported back to us that he encountered an
error message during the installation that the following firmware file
couldn't be found:

rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw

I checked our installer source and determined that we do supply a
firmware-realtek package that contains this firmware file:

server /root/install-jessie-new/add/firmware # dpkg-deb -c firmware-realtek_0.43_all.deb | grep rtl8168e-3
-rw-r--r-- root/root      3872 2014-06-16 01:51 ./lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw

Then I booted the installer in a VM and looked in /cdrom/firmware. Most of the
firmware packages there were files, but some were symlinks, including
the firmware-realtek package:

root@unassigned:/cdrom/firmware# find . -type l -exec ls -l {} \;
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 62 May 19  2016 ./firmware-bnx2_0.43_all.deb -> ../pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.43_all.deb
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 60 May 19  2016 ./firmware-linux-free_3.3_all.deb -> ../pool/main/f/firmware-free/firmware-linux-free_3.3_all.deb
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 71 May 19  2016 ./firmware-linux-nonfree_0.43_all.deb -> ../pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-linux-nonfree_0.43_all.deb
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 65 May 19  2016 ./firmware-realtek_0.43_all.deb -> ../pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-realtek_0.43_all.deb

I believe that the Debian installer build process automatically replaces
firmware files with symlinks to the pool if it determines those files to be
identical. To ensure that this not a problem caused by simple-cdd, I booted the
current Debian netinst that I downloaded here:

http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/8.5.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-8.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso

There was only a single file located in /cdrom/firmware, but it was also a
symlink:

/cdrom/firmware/firmware-linux-free-3.3_all.deb -> ../pool/main/f/firmware-free/firmware-linux-free-3.3_all.deb

So apparently it's not caused by simple-cdd.

I then figured out that the installer uses a script called
check-missing-firmware to load firmware; apparently it determines
missing firmware files and looks amongst others in /cdrom/firmware for
firmware packages which might provide these files. Unfortunately, the
code only accepts packages that are real files, not symlinks; notice the
[ -f ... ] in line 238 in the function check_for_firmware:

check_for_firmware() {
  echo "$files" | sed -e 's/ /\n/g' >/tmp/grepfor
  for filename in $@; do
    if [ -f "$filename" ]; then
      if check_deb_arch "$filename" && list_deb_firmware "$filename" | grep -qf /tmp/grepfor; then
        log "installing firmware package $filename"
        install_firmware_pkg "$filename" || true
      fi
    fi
  done
  rm -f /tmp/grepfor
}

I think that this is a bug and it is responsible for the firmware our
customer reported. I've marked this bug as important because I believe
it has a major impact on the correct operation of this script. Attached
is a simple patch that replaces the `-f` with `-e`, which should fix
this problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- check-missing-firmware.sh.orig	2012-06-15 07:56:09.000000000 +0200
+++ check-missing-firmware.sh	2016-06-06 16:41:44.985996412 +0200
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
 check_for_firmware() {
 	echo "$files" | sed -e 's/ /\n/g' >/tmp/grepfor
 	for filename in $@; do
-		if [ -f "$filename" ]; then
+		if [ -e "$filename" ]; then
 			if check_deb_arch "$filename" && list_deb_firmware "$filename" | grep -qf /tmp/grepfor; then
 				log "installing firmware package $filename"
 				install_firmware_pkg "$filename" || true

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags unreproducible
thanks

Hi Steve,

> -f *should* work fine for symlinks too in shell:
> 
> tack:~$ ln -s foo bar
> tack:~$ ls -al foo bar
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 steve users  3 Jun  6 16:24 bar -> foo
> -rw-r--r-- 1 steve users 13 Mar 22 20:39 foo
> tack:~$ if [ -f bar ] ; then echo ok ; fi
> ok

Whoops, you're right, I hadn't considered that.

Unfortunately, I can't actually reproduce the original issue because we
don't have the affected machine here. For the time being, I'll just
close this bug report as unreproducible; if we encounter it again, I'll
have the customer boot a rescue system so I can track it down, and then
I'll report back. Thanks for the help!

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Martin v. Wittich

IServ GmbH
Bültenweg 73
38106 Braunschweig

Telefon:   0531-2243666-0
Fax:       0531-2243666-9
E-Mail:    info@iserv.eu
Internet:  iserv.eu

USt-IdNr. DE265149425 | Amtsgericht Braunschweig | HRB 201822
Geschäftsführer: Benjamin Heindl, Jörg Ludwig

--- End Message ---

Reply to: