Bug#796603: closed by Anton Zinoviev <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Bug#796603: fixed in console-setup 1.138)
Thank you for the useful explanations in your message!
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 02:51:34PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I meant the logic to determine if setupcon or the cached scripts should be
> run. If in the future that part is changed (eg, the names are changed, or
> more scripts are generated), there is no guarantee the change will reach
> users, since they may have modified the init script.
I see... Yes, you are correct about this.
> However, this is not exactly the same: if the cached script fails, then
> setupcon would not be run.
I was just pondering on the different options I had. One of them was
to change the cached script so that it runs setupcon when necessary.
> Also, I would advise against having different logic in the systemd services
> than in the init scripts: the maintenance burden is higher, and requires a
> higher initial understanding from people not already familiar with the
I agree in 100% with this.