[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#806926: Bug#766400: installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104 report



Hi Martin,

On 02/18/2016 08:36 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Uwe, does that look ok?

Yes, the rn104 entry is what I'm using, I'm just missing the
Kernel-Flavors line, which looks ok, too.

Do we need "Bootloader-Sets-Incorrect-Root: yes"? I modified the u-boot
env to pass the right root= and rootflags= parameter.

Gijs uses

	U-Boot-Initrd-Address: 0x0

on a rn102, but I think this is not optimal.

Best regards
Uwe


Reply to: