Bug#806926: Bug#766400: installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104 report
Hi Martin,
On 02/18/2016 08:36 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Uwe, does that look ok?
Yes, the rn104 entry is what I'm using, I'm just missing the
Kernel-Flavors line, which looks ok, too.
Do we need "Bootloader-Sets-Incorrect-Root: yes"? I modified the u-boot
env to pass the right root= and rootflags= parameter.
Gijs uses
U-Boot-Initrd-Address: 0x0
on a rn102, but I think this is not optimal.
Best regards
Uwe
Reply to: