On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 08:58 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 22.01.2016 01:14, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This series removes the busybox hook script and definition of > > BUSYBOXDIR from initramfs-tools, leaving busybox itself responsible > > for these. > > Oh well. How many times I talked with Max on IRC, sent patches, > created a git tree for initramfs to pull from.. His answer has > always been the same: no need. So I gave up, creating an ugly > zzz-busybox which undoes the mess done in initramfs script. That's strange as the TODO file said it should be done. > Please note that once the d-i team prevented me from maintaining > busybox, this package remains unmaintained. So maybe it is a > better idea to remove usage of busybox in initramfs (which this > series actually does). It doesn't; busybox is still recommended and used by default. Ben. > Thank you Ben! > > (And yes, I'm still subscribed to busybox package, for unknown > reason). > > /mjt > -- Ben Hutchings Quantity is no substitute for quality, but it's the only one we've got.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part