On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:19:16 +0300 Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:37:18PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:22:46 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > Dear console-setup package maintainers, > > is there anything blocking the adoption of the suggested solution for > > this bug? > > I am sorry if I have created the impression that the proposed solution > is not accepted. Personally, I prefer to work on console-setup in a > batch mode and I plan to work on it during the second half of Ferbruary. > Although I am not sure if I will use exactly this solution, I don't mind > if other developers decide to upload a version of console-setup with it. That's OK, but, perhaps, next time you could reply earlier to inform interested parties about your plans. I got the (wrong) impression that something was preventing the proposed solution from being accepted just because of the total silence on the package maintainers' side! > > The discussion this bug was very helpful and I think I have a reasonable > hypothesis and understanding why the present version of console-setup > doesn't work with systemd. I sincerely thank all participants! OK, I am looking forward to seeing this bug fixed. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpFdFAdFmPO_.pgp
Description: PGP signature