Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> (2016-01-11): > Why was Reiser3 phased out? It wasn't *grossly* unstable or anything, > and despite lack of maintenance it was still a good little filesystem > that could have stayed for longer. > > And why UFS? It may be obsolete, but I should think it would be > relatively stable. Surely a filesystem should only be removed when it > is actually a steaming wreck, not just when the devs don't like it > anymore. You probably want to be asking LKML or debian-kernel@ (or searching their respective archives), debian-boot@ isn't responsible for decisions as far as kernel upstream or kernel packaging goes. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature