[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#808041: s390-zfcp: Install Debian on FC-attached SCSI devices on s390



Hi!

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 06:07:23PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (2015-12-15):
> > Package: d-i.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: d-i
> > 
> > Dear Debian Installer Team and Maintainers,
> > 
> > I would like to contribute a new package for the Debian Installer
> > to configure FCP devices and install Debian on SCSI devices which
> > are available on Linux on z Systems.
> > 
> > FCP device provide access to SAN storage, for example, SCSI devices.
> > SCSI devices and DASD devices are the main storage devices on a mainframe.
> > 
> > With the FCP configuration utility, users can enable FCP devices.
> > Depending on the hardware configuration of the FCP devices, LUNs will
> > be automatically detected and attached;  alternatively, users are guided
> > to manually add LUNs.  The FCP configuration utility can be preseeded
> > to perform an unattended configuration of FCP devices.
> > 
> > I will attach the patches for this new utility, as well as, a README
> > with more details in another mail.
> > 
> > Feedback for the FCP configuration utility is very welcome!
> > I am looking forward to discuss and work with you on the steps to make
> > it available with the Debian Installer.
> 
> Thanks! I'm adding Philipp and S/390 people in copy so that we get as
> many eyes as possible on your proposed patches.
>

Thank you... CCing is more clear.  I initially added Philipp and the s390
mailing using X-Debbugs-CC.

> I'm afraid I don't know
> much about this platform for one thing, and lack time to learn more
> about it right now for another; sorry about that. :/

No problem.   Getting access to s390 hardware is a bit difficult.
But any help and feedback regarding the integration into debian
and the debian installer is very helpful.

Thanks and kind regards,
  Hendrik

Attachment: pgpcTuZfcFdJS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: