Re: Bug#798347: fdisk-udeb: not installable, depends on libtinfo5
Andreas Henriksson, le Tue 08 Sep 2015 18:01:08 +0200, a écrit :
> Are there any issues I should be aware of that would outweigh the
> benefits mentioned above? (I'm aware it's not perfectly optimal
> to build staticly, but can anyone forsee any actual practical or
> policy issue with doing so?)
The static binary will carry possibly outdated copies of the library
(potentially with bugs etc.). The size may also matter for embedded
archs.
Samuel
Reply to: