Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-09-02):
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 22:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-09-01):
> > > Thanks for the quick turn-around; I've flagged that for acceptance.
> >
> > Buildds look happier this time. Will take care of d-i-n-i somewhen this
> > wednesday once everything is on mirrors.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > (You might have seen d-i-n-i/jessie on p-u-NEW already.)
>
> I spotted the commits on IRC. :-) Just waiting for it to work its way
> through the machinery now.
The binary diffs look reasonable, but the source appears to have
acquired
Release | 1591
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Release.gpg | 28
I assume that wasn't intentional?
It indeed wasn't, and my source debdiff seems to have been checked
after
a (clean…) source rebuild, because finger memory…
I'm prepapring another upload, feel free to have the package rejected
in
the meanwhile. Reusing the version number shouldn't be an issue after
such a reject AFAICT, so I'm just rebuilding a clean(er) package.