[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#591012: marked as done (netcfg: Support /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier for link detection?)



Your message dated Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:44:25 +0000
with message-id <E1Ztdl3-0005tT-A5@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#591012: fixed in netcfg 1.135
has caused the Debian Bug report #591012,
regarding netcfg: Support /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier for link detection?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
591012: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591012
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.54

Should netcfg link detection be extended to use
/sys/class/net/ethX/carrier if it exist?  At the moment its
ethtool_lite() function uses the mii-diag/ethtool kernel API to check
link status, but the /sys/ file seem to be a more generic way to do
this.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 1.135

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 591012@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (supplier of updated netcfg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:03:53 +0100
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.135
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Description:
 netcfg     - Configure the network (udeb)
 netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb)
Closes: 591012 798373
Changes:
 netcfg (1.135) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Philipp Kern ]
   * ethtool-lite: read the kernel's carrier detection result from sysfs
     on Linux (Closes: #591012)
   * Default wireless_security_type to WPA. (Closes: #798373)
Checksums-Sha1:
 0433d9b5027b6f82101b0144187598466999e682 1891 netcfg_1.135.dsc
 f2ad217ee5eec48c92ee1a7beac866291d9e1018 392676 netcfg_1.135.tar.xz
 d5b1a23a6e92ea390ad39de9152664e6002f7a7a 341768 netcfg-static_1.135_i386.udeb
 dba1828e40a954bece17870b402bc54545a2b4a8 436936 netcfg_1.135_i386.udeb
Checksums-Sha256:
 4a4d6fba7343fb59abe957c714ad68cfebb6731b2691576c9295f26d57c3cf99 1891 netcfg_1.135.dsc
 f94ec9c0e04909943ac18effa9493a84f35a9fea0527fb684771df2a86de3354 392676 netcfg_1.135.tar.xz
 4055b162267a60595e6ab72754b2f054424f39216bc0dae9f01c0e5616e73d49 341768 netcfg-static_1.135_i386.udeb
 6ebd374ce7276610f27a234f22aadec5d5c9c487f5c60e11a6e148a664e7deb9 436936 netcfg_1.135_i386.udeb
Files:
 f3c18f6f14f8e0c511ca61663879ec60 1891 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.135.dsc
 98b26e585d8a328f1c7f5e0af1a47218 392676 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.135.tar.xz
 91b48ca6b24c622384e3241845653624 341768 debian-installer optional netcfg-static_1.135_i386.udeb
 1b095324509ffdeb200de092d06ac59e 436936 debian-installer optional netcfg_1.135_i386.udeb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWOMZtAAoJEIcvcCxNbiWo3KgQAIRVFg2ndOL+eQJtD0g9qrHG
PdDnyTU7sAfw+ZuL46+7TRlTdc+Ba2Syu2tsR4Rpfg8raPfMIC992WukLZLvNViX
+vsKjxQqWyD8EQ6fPCEUe4oXnBhC3+HjgPa2fbrqtbS97TA2aTurNjk8UZyfrcoX
FSOBcoPPYcGBNLQ9pQOx/XT3Cdc3dl14pH0ZX63rMHu4mGXx3EWC2AoAybiK+fdP
JGi0dihib7Aq9qLjlxaIqTRNwGVL9r/BbPtsA8DP5WOrc1O2BHpJAEX7n9crsieR
8oWd5MXDTQ6mPxbGE54bRDuXBflgmgAh0Hsp0nOkhw16FulJxmoLB5uqi+qKKrWH
xVzAYfvEJ9jbROTCP9E5wPga0cw7tUEn5vPYbIcpJrHdhy/L4bW/S9NOUyxkRqIt
er80N9EzPUeAPi1j6XGWz2hKAAX9hVzk6X16xJljGDDhD4VhFsdDFXGMc9ZDkB6N
K3M4v1vV3+eMf9Xu0bYu42xhIZRQn+d/sfQPbr0XgeVndsoaEecg+gVWX94UqiX4
26nA8/CDiAAeFyIM8VEmCaB3/ort3ly69j3GsPJf7vzNTexTiasfMqi05qTWmsU1
crLYM2ZKY5YmLregcfTsSHQwsFpYtk9tSaCwf6vfbo0E74KDwi08k2tbdPvy4vDi
l8BAk9LaDx/mzAukUv/z
=zsL8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: