[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#702278: busybox upload



On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 00:09:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> Control: tag -1 -confirmed
> 
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> (2013-05-09):
> > Control: reopen -1
> > 
> > 05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
> > 
> > Hmm.  I didn't notice the bug has been closed...
> > Reopening it (now re-titled as a pu), instead of
> > submiting a new report, so that all the information
> > is in one place.
> > 
> > Thanks, and sorry for all the noize.
> > 
> > /mjt
> 
> For the record, I think I would like to see some automated d-i
> non-regression tests implemented before touching busybox in stable.
> 
> Spending more time with -release@ stuff those days, but still spending
> some with -boot@, so hopefully we're getting those $some_day.
> 
This wheezy update is probably not happening anymore, closing the bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: