Re: Building kernel the Debian way fails
Appreciated, Ben!
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 22:23 -0700, Jose R R wrote:
> [...]
>> Procedure executes for a while but then:
>>
>> [...]
>> xt_unregister_targets module:
>> net/netfilter/x_tables, version: 0x1ab6dab6 -> 0x967580ea, export:
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> yield_to module: vmlinux,
>> version: 0x64772de8 -> 0x7e986552, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> zap_vma_ptes module: vmlinux,
>> version: 0x51123f12 -> 0xe4761abe, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>> zero_fill_bio module: vmlinux,
>> version: 0x999a9bec -> 0x2f0438ba, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> zerocopy_sg_from_iter module: vmlinux,
>> version: 0x156cb754 -> 0x3396ed70, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> zl10036_attach module:
>> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/zl10036, version: 0x01c15872 ->
>> 0x5ad87e01, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> zl10039_attach module:
>> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/zl10039, version: 0x4d52eac4 ->
>> 0x99661045, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
>> zl10353_attach module:
>> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/zl10353, version: 0xd7c34f95 ->
>> 0x6f771756, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
>>
>> Removed symbols:
>> bdi_unregister ignored, module:
>> vmlinux, version: 0xa88ae9e6, export: EXPORT_SYMBOL
> [...]
>
> See
> <http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-versions.html#s-abi-maintenance>
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.
>
A couple of hours ago I increased the abi and repeated the
instructions for the procedure -- which finally ended successfully.
Best Professional Regards.
--
Jose R R
http://www.metztli-it.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: