Bug#789475: udhcpc: valid rfc1123 hostname recognized as "bad"
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> The valid hostname "52-54-0-12-34-56" is recognized as bad
> while it should be valid according to rfc1123 (Section 2.1).
What programma and/or device did recognize "52-54-0-12-34-56" as bad?
How was the error encountered? Any error messages?
Please elaborate what the reason for this bugreport is.
> Capture of the DHCP reply:
> be1.lrz.bootps > 192.168.7.107.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 300, xid 0x4cc35164, Flags [none]
> Vendor-rfc1048 Extensions
> DHCP-Message Option 53, length 1: ACK
> Hostname Option 12, length 16: "52-54-0-12-34-56"
That is content from a network packet sent by a DHCP server,
which might be configured for providing such hostname.
Please provide more information.
Leven en laten leven