[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#785149: grub-installer: NVMe boot drives not supported



I just realized that an out-of-band email thread I had with Cyril didn’t make it to this issue - here’s the final email to me from Cyril:

-----
Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com> (2015-05-12):
> 
>> On May 12, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote:
>>> --- grub-installer-1.117/grub-installer	2015-01-12 23:01:14.000000000 -0500
>>> +++ grub-installer-1.117/grub-installer.fixed	2015-05-12 15:13:49.002358498 -0400
>>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
>>> # This should probably be rewritten using udevadm or similar.
>>> device_to_disk () {
>>> 	echo "$1" | \
>>> -		sed 's:\(/dev/\(cciss\|ida\|rs\)/c[0-9]d[0-9][0-9]*\|/dev/mmcblk[0-9]\|/dev/\(ad\|ada\|da\)[0-9]\+\|/dev/[hs]d[0-9]\+\|/dev/[a-z]\+\).*:\1:'
>>> +		sed 's:\(/dev/nvme[0-9]n[0-9]\|/dev/\(cciss\|ida\|rs\)/c[0-9]d[0-9][0-9]*\|/dev/mmcblk[0-9]\|/dev/\(ad\|ada\|da\)[0-9]\+\|/dev/[hs]d[0-9]\+\|/dev/[a-z]\+\).*:\1:'
>> 
>> I moved the addition to the end, which makes visual inspection slightly
>> easier.
> 
> There’s a problem with this: the preceding pattern "/dev/[a-z]\+" will match "/dev/nvme.*”, so the nvme pattern will never be reached. 

Good catch, pushed this extra commit accordingly:
 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/grub-installer.git/commit/?id=22a8aef

>>> # Run update-grub in $ROOT
>>> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
>>>    /dev/mapper)
>>> 	disc_offered_devfs="$bootfs"
>>> 	;;
>>> -    /dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]|/dev/xvd[a-z]|/dev/cciss/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/ida/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/rs/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/mmcblk[0-9]|/dev/ad[0-9]*|/dev/da[0-9]*)
>>> +    /dev/nvme[0-9]n[0-9]|/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]|/dev/xvd[a-z]|/dev/cciss/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/ida/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/rs/c[0-9]d[0-9]*|/dev/mmcblk[0-9]|/dev/ad[0-9]*|/dev/da[0-9]*)
>> 
>> Same story here.
> 
> Looks like there is no general pattern that will match “/dev/nvme.*”
> above, so putting it at the end isn’t a problem.

Adjusted for consistency.

Thanks again!

Mraw,
KiBi.
-----

Reply to: